Lewis Terman began the first long-term study of intelligence quotient (IQ) in 1921. He followed 1,500 students for decades. He succeeded in showing that children with a high IQ were not sickly or social misfits. (Yay!)
He was surprised to learn, however, that IQ is not perfectly correlated with achievement. On average, individuals with a higher IQ do have a higher income later in life, but many highly intelligent individuals do not perform better than average, and many with a lower IQ outperform more intelligent individuals. IQ is one factor, but there are other factors that may do a better job at predicting success.
Self-discipline and Grit
Walter Mischel discovered in the 1980s that a 4 year old's ability to delay gratification was a good predictor of academic achievement 10 years later. In the now famous Stanford marshmallow experiment, Mischel gave children a marshmallow or other small treat. He told children that they would receive a second treat if they waited for fifteen minutes without eating the first treat. The ability to delay gratification as a 4 year-old was correlated with future academic success, social success, lower body mass index, and even higher SAT scores.Another study looked at multiple measures of self-discipline in a group of eighth graders. The study found the self-discipline rating for each student to be highly predictive of final GPA, whereas IQ was only slightly correlated. The effect was seen on both ends of the spectrum. Measuring in the lowest quartile for self-discipline hurt students' GPA more than being in the lowest quartile for intelligence. Similarly, being in the highest quartile for self-discipline improved GPA more than being in the highest quartile for intelligence.
There are certainly other traits correlated with achievement, but if you need to focus on just one, self-discipline might be a great place to start.

